Pope Francis on Islam

By Fr Anthony Egan, S.J.

I really like to see, amidst the populist appeals of many politicians to the lowest – the very lowest – common denominator in humanity, that a public figure has the courage to talk sense about religion. The figure is (I am tempted to say again) Pope Francis. The occasion: his interview with the French newspaper La Croix. And the religion is Islam, with a thoroughly appropriate dig at the excesses within Christian tradition and modern secularism as well.

It is really a pleasure, at a time when rabble-rousers try to trump reason (pun intended), to hear the Pope calling us back to a more balanced perspective on Islam. He is quite right I think in his intuition that Western home-grown Islamic extremism is a product of ghettoization, and that further marginalisation of Muslims feeds the lunacy that is Islamic State. This in turn plays into the hands of cynical populist politicians who manipulate legitimate fears of violence to gain power. This further intensifies Muslim feelings of being marginalised and oppressed, giving its lunatic fringe the ‘justifications’ it seeks.

As an outsider I find much about Islam with which to disagree. On a theological level the idea of a literal reading of sacred scriptures seems to run counter to the historical and critical approaches that are second nature to my way of thinking. Such a reading opens itself to reading things into a text that aren’t there; at worst it can open religion to demagoguery.

Aspects of the social and ethical dimensions of the faith also worry me, particularly where it’s used to enforce gender inequality, treats other religions with less than equal respect, or encourages religious conquest.

But, as Francis noted, Christianity itself is also not blameless with regard to religious conquest. Nor, I would add, have we been models of tolerance or paragons of gender justice. Many Christians also have literal readings of the Bible and are fundamentalist when interpreting doctrine. Much of the progress we’ve made in becoming more accepting of religious difference is the result of the rise of secular democracy, often despite the resistance of many Churches.

So is secularism the answer? Well, it depends what one means by secularism. If by secularism we mean deliberately marginalising religion in society, often treating faith with disdain: No. This creates ghetto mentalities that breed resentment and religious extremism. If it means that the state adopts a neutral policy to religion, both protecting the right to express faith – without any faith using the state to further or police its beliefs – and defending the right to differ within faiths, and even the right not to believe: Yes.

Francis rightly rebukes the French state for leaning too far towards the former model of secularism. Many Christians will agree with him.

I suspect many Muslims share his view too, detest religious extremism and welcome the opportunity to live as believers in a tolerant state that embraces pluralism. Before we Christians get swept away by anti-Islamic demagoguery, we should remember this.

Follow the Jesuit Institute on twitter @JesuitInstitute

PPC Documents

Please find below the PPC documents from the most recent APC meeting.

http://adct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/PPC-training-May-2016.pdf

http://adct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/PPC-Voting-Form.pdf

http://adct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/PPC-Report-Template.pdf

http://adct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/PPC-Nomination-Form.pdf

http://adct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/PPC-Nominee-Information-Page-Template.pdf

http://adct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/PRAYER-FOR-AFRICA.pdf

 

Archdiocesan Liturgical Commission

The principal role and responsibility of the Liturgical Commission is to assist the Archbishop in the promotion of authentic liturgical life in the Archdiocese of Cape Town. The Commission is among other things:

  • to deal with specific issues and questions concerning the liturgy;
  • to present new liturgical documents and directives and, where necessary, to workshop them;
  • to provide training and formation for all liturgical ministries;
  • to organise large Archdiocesan liturgies, including those of the Centre for Pastoral Development;
  • to develop a multi-cultural Archdiocesan choir;
  • to foster liturgical music of a high standard, including within this mandate, the fostering of such music within diocesan and parish choirs;
  • to provide assistance with respect to liturgical art and architecture.

The Commission is currently being reconstituted.

Archdiocesan Master of Ceremonies: Dcn Rodney Williams.

Tel: 021 862 0319, 082 467 7963. Email: rodneynw@telkomsa.net

Assistant: Dcn Bradley Davids. Tel: 021 762 4296. Email: ndiyazama@mweb.co.za

FILES AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

OUR LADY OF THE FLIGHT INTO EGYPT – PATRONAL FEAST  OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CAPE TOWN
Download the Mass texts and Readings for this Feast HERE

MASS OF ST PETER
Mass of St Peter, Organ Edition
Mass of St Peter, Parish Edition
AUDIO FILES FOR MASS OF ST PETER
St Peter Agnus Dei St Peter Amen Response St Peter Gloria St Peter Ite Missa est St Peter Kyrie St Peter Memoria 1 St Peter Memoria 2 St Peter Memorial 3 St Peter Sanctus

MASS OF ST THOMAS MORE
Mass of St Thomas More, organ
AUDIO FILES FOR MASS OF ST THOMAS MORE
St Thomas Gloria Refrain St Thomas More Agnus Dei St Thomas More Alleluia St Thomas More Kyrie St Thomas More Mysterium 1 St Thomas More Mysterium 2 St Thomas More Mysterium 3 St Thomas More Sanctus

Women’s League Theology

The African National Congress Women’s League defence of Jacob Zuma against religious leaders bears an uncanny resemblance to the ‘State Theology’ of the apartheid era. Though few I suspect (even dare I say it within the ANC) take the ANCWL seriously any more, this thinking needs to be challenged.

By the mid-1980s religious communities were in ideological conflict with the South African state – and within themselves. While the government of finger-wagging P W Botha tried desperately to portray its weakening grasp on power as a holy war, of Christianity against Communism, the Christian churches (and institutions within other faiths) were battling between certain tendencies within themselves. Those sympathetic to the regime were pitted against fellow Christians committed to its overthrow, while others tried to stay out of the battle.

In 1985 a group of activist Christians produced the Kairos Document, which called on religious activists to resist the state and channel its energies into speeding its demise. They rejected the lack of commitment of those within their ranks, who stayed aloof from the fray, and condemned in the strongest terms, as demonic, the state’s use of theology.

The present stance of the ANCWL bears certain comparison. Their denunciation of religious leaders who have called on Jacob Zuma to resign, arguing that he has already apologised and that our religious duty is to forgive him, is at best misguided, at worst mischievous. Zuma has not apologised for his actions – he has in fact not admitted responsibility. You cannot reconcile with someone who refuses to admit he’s done any wrong.

Similarly, let us examine the underlying theology of the ANCWL. It assumes a blanket righteousness of Zuma and the ANC, perhaps even identifying the party with the state, indeed the party’s will with God’s will. That is what Kairos called State Theology. It also assumes that the role of religion is to forgive and forget, to take the president’s ‘apology’ at face value, and to focus solely on matters spiritual. In short they want us all to take a position of neutrality, what Kairos rejected as Church Theology. It is also, to use a term that needs to be a part of any healthy religious lexicon (but is all too often overlooked), rubbish.

It is rubbish because any sound theology must embrace a socio-political dimension. The world is God’s world; what happens in the world matters. All great religions recognise this in many and various ways. We are not solely concerned with hurrying ourselves to the Afterlife. If we did we’d make suicide a sacrament.

We don’t.

The example of the Kairos Document – and the call by church leaders for a Day of Prayer to End Unjust Rule during the 1980s – should even be revisited in our present era. The crisis in our democracy, with its culture of corruption and elite enrichment, must surely count as a ‘Kairos moment’, calling for a new Kairos theology.  And how outrageous, I wonder, would be a call for a Day of Prayer to End Corrupt Rule?

By Fr Anthony Egan, S.J.

Press Statement on SA’s Leadership

OUR LEADERSHIP: “JUDGED BECAUSE OF THEIR VANITY”

6 April 2016

The Jesuit Institute strongly condemns the way South Africa’s leadership has sacrificed “a better life for all” on the altar of selfishness, greed, ego, hypocrisy and dishonesty. What happened in Parliament on Tuesday shows that corruption, like a drug, has colonized the minds of our leadership and they can no longer think or lead clearly.

Speaking in Kenya last year, Pope Francis described corruption as “a path to death.” South Africa now stares that path in the face. Our public life is fast becoming dead to any sense of moral integrity. The common good, once summed up in the noble ideals of the Freedom Charter and other programmes expressing freedom for our people, is no longer that for which we strive. We have settled for the lowest common denominator of dictatorships everywhere; beneath a veneer of freedom and human rights, a self-serving elite treats the country as its personal fiefdom, the law is at best an advisory, and the people as little more than vote fodder, to be lied to always, and placated with welfare crumbs from the rich men’s tables.

Pope Francis went on to say “Each time when we accept a bribe and we put it in our pockets, we destroy our hearts, we destroy our personalities, and we destroy our country. Corruption moreover takes away our joy, our peace. Corrupt people don’t live in peace.” South Africa is not at peace and is being destroyed by those who have been consumed by corruption.

The Prophet Hosea judges Judah and Ephraim harshly “The princes of Judah have become like those who move a boundary, on them I will pour out my wrath like water. Ephraim is oppressed, crushed in judgment, because he was determined to go after vanity” (5:10-11). The people of South Africa deserve better. They do not deserve to be abused, yet again, by a government whose only interest is itself.

Scandal after scandal has been the hallmark of this presidency. Increasingly it seems that the problem may go beyond him and reflect a systematic problem with his party. The sometime party of liberation, like many liberation movements in parliamentary politics has become fat: feeding on its own people like ticks on a cow, its leadership seeks its own comfort and well being, not that of those who elected them. Feeding on its own propaganda, it thinks that it is invulnerable, even at times godlike. It attempts to use the poor as welfare grant hostages who are expected to vote up, shut up and put up with whatever seems expedient to those in power. The people of South Africa have been patient, they have afforded leadership the time and space to deal with the problems the country faces. Leadership has failed and a crisis looms. Our leadership stands judged because of their vanity.

The Jesuit Institute, like many other voices in the country, calls for president Zuma to take the only moral option he now has: resign. We call on those in the National Assembly, who have collaborated in this, to repent their failure to honour the country’s Constitution. At the very least we should see a thorough going review of our electoral system including the possible direct popular election of the president and a public vetting of candidates for cabinet positions.

We call on the leaders of all faith communities to speak out. Since 1994 we have failed in our religious obligation to promote the common good and, particularly, address those most vulnerable in society. You can longer afford to be silent, lead your people!

Furthermore, we encourage the people of South Africa to channel disappointment and despair into action to help bring about the common good every concerned citizen desires. Participate in any legal, non-violent movement/s that will show those in leadership that we are serious about accountability and that we will no longer accept corruption. Do not let the evil of despondency and lethargy win you over! The Jesuit institute welcomes initiatives like that of the alliance of civil society, church, trade unions and academic organizations who have announced that they will confront the political and economic crisis South Africa faces.

Kwanele, kwanele! Enough is enough!

ENDS
————————————————–

Fr. Russell Pollitt, S.J.

Director

082 737 2054

r.pollitt@jesuitinstitute.org.za

Dr. Anthony Egan, S.J.

Political Analyst/Social Ethicist

072 938 4553

a.egan@jesuitinstitute.org.za

Archbishop Brislin’s Chrism Mass Homily

After the 2015 Synod on the family, Cardinal Donald Wuerl, the Archbishop of Washington DC, gave a press interview in which he spoke of the way in which the Synod was conducted and the open participation that was evident. He said that we are moving away from a Church of legalism to a Church of mercy, that the framework for the Church is no longer Canon Law but the Gospel.

It is clear that Pope Francis wishes us to focus our eyes on the mercy of Christ – to be merciful like the Father – and that like Christ “we see the person”.

As priests, we ask ourselves “how do we change? How do we deepen our understanding of the merciful Father? How do we become more merciful and caring and be like Christ the Good Shepherd? How do we move away from legalism to the mercy of the Gospel?” We often hear views on the “institutional” Church. What is meant by the institutional Church may differ from person to person. Some may think of it as the Curia in Rome, others as “the Chancery”, yet others as the “hierarchy” or the bishop. But the fact of the matter is that we need the Curia, we need these structures. The “institutional” Church is far more of a mindset, a way of thinking, a system of pastoral practice and ministry – an ecclesiology.

  • As priests we know that it is through our ministry that we become channels of God’s grace and loving mercy. We know what is expected of us in our pastoral ministry:
  • to teach and preach, and that to do that well we have to prepare well, to ensure that we participate in on-going formation, to continue to read, to be abreast with current issues and affairs;
  • to celebrate the Eucharist with dignity, respect and reverence, and never losing our sense of awe at this great miracle and mystery;
    similarly, to celebrate the other sacraments with dignity and respect;
  • to visit parishioners and families;
  • to visit and show a special concern for the sick;
  • to be available to penitents, even out of the set hours for Confession, recognizing that it often takes a great deal of courage for a person to request Confession
  • especially is he or she has been lapsed for some time;
  • to be available to our parishioners in general. Recently, at the episcopal ordination of the new nuncio to South Africa, Archbishop Wells, Pope Francis instructed bishops to be available to their priests, saying that it was unacceptable when the bishop’s PA says that an appointment will only be available in 3 months time. In the same way, priests should be available to parishioners;
  • to give comfort to the bereaved, whether they are bereaved through death, divorce or some other form of loss;
  • to welcome strangers, refugees and immigrants.

But all these things we do can easily become routine unless we also work on who we are as priests. Priesthood is not simply a matter of doing, it is a matter of being. “Doing” well depends on our “being” been well.

To ensure this, firstly we must be men of PRAYER – something which the Holy Father reminded bishops of in the same homily at the ordination of Archbishop Wells. As priests we are conscious of the fact that we are only the earthenware vessels: it is not us who heal, it is Christ. It is not us who baptize, it is Christ. We cannot teach Christ unless we are in communion with Christ, and prayer is our communion with Christ. Ultimately, prayer is a discipline and we need to be faithful to it, especially to Sacramental Life, the Liturgy of the Hours, meditation or reflection and to the rosary. When we celebrate Liturgy we should ensure that it is a real celebration, our prayer to God, and not merely ritual.

The second point is much more personal. Henri Nouwen said in his book “The Wounded Healer”: the great illusion of leadership is to think that man can be led out of the desert by someone who has never been there. Can we heal when we have never recognized our own wounds? Can we be merciful is we have not recognized our own need for mercy and have implored God for that mercy? St Peter, in his first letter, reminds us that “by his wounds you have been healed”. Christ’s wounds are the source of our healing from sin, from death. His wounds are the source of our salvation and he was wounded in order to save us. As priests we have to come to terms with our own “woundedness”, no matter what the source of that is. It may be through past hurts, harm that was done to us by others, a sense of loneliness or incompleteness. There may be disappointment, unfulfilled dreams or disillusionment. We have to start by acknowledging that we are wounded whether through our own sinfulness or through what has been done to us or simply through life’s knocks. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT must lead us to deal with these things, and we may need help with that through spiritual direction or counseling. If we do not face them, they easily fester and become a residual anger, frustration and inner conflicts. Thirdly, whatever pain we have or do experience must be transformed from an unhealthy introspection and turning inwards, to merciful (wounded) ministry and recognition of the suffering of others. Our own experience of suffering and pain enables us to support and give solidarity to others in pain.

The best example I can think of is a South African. South Africa has produced many great people, and one of them is Dr Beyers Naude. As you know, he was a minister in the Dutch Reformed Church, a theologian and supporter of apartheid. But he was also an honest man and a person of integrity. He came to realise that what he believed about the Biblical justification of apartheid was wrong. He went against his own church and his own people. For that he was derided, ostracized, rejected, despised, harassed, expelled by his own people. But, he never showed any bitterness or anger, his forgiveness and understanding were unfeigned. He was always gentle and able to accept all the anger and hatred against him. It was as if he were able simply to absorb it all and transform it into compassion, understanding and forgiveness. He remains a great example of Christian maturity.

Similarly, we too move away from self-pity and a sense of being a victim to a Christian maturity of not been overwhelmed by suffering but allowing it to make us more Christ-like. Only then do we understand the words of Jesus that to find life we must lose it first, and that the beginning and end of Christian leadership is to give our lives to others (Nouwen).

Thirdly, and finally, as priests we have been entrusted with the ministry of reconciliation and are called to RECONCILE PEOPLE to God and people to people. We may do this through the Sacrament, spiritual direction or advice. But we are also conscious of the fact that it is a Christian imperative to seek reconciliation and to restore, mend and heal broken relationships. As disciples, and as priests, we are conscious of our own need to be reconciled to God and to seek to be reconciled with those we have hurt, ignored, disregarded or treated badly – as well as to be reconciled with those we have allowed to hurt us. It is only when we ourselves seek reconciliation that we truly become ministers of reconciliation.

Without these, we may be efficient, “professional”, reliable and punctual in all we do – these are all good things. But, we can lack the foundation of ministry, love. Love of Christ, love of neighbour, love of the Church and love of our priesthood is the motivation for our ministry. Without love ministry becomes a “job”, something we have to do. If we, like Christ, can look into the eyes of those we serve, and recognize their happinesses and joys, but also their sorrows, anxieties, insecurities and pain, then our ministry moves from legalism to mercy.

OUR LADY HELP OF CHRISTIANS – LANSDOWNE
24 MARCH 2016